Market Review, first-half of 2018

The first half of 2018 has been weak for virtually all asset classes except the particularly volatile commodity sector. In equities the S&P 500 was almost flat (+1.7%) and most other equity markets were flattish or down -3% to -5%. 

In fixed income the iBoxx Corporate Investment Grade index was down 4.3%. We view this as a significant development which illustrates well the often underestimated risk related to fixed income. While it is often presented as the “safe part” of a portfolio, it is in reality subject, like any investment, to significant risks, particularly the risk of rising interest rates. This risk has been latent for the past couple of years - when interest rates get close to zero they cannot fall much lower but on the other side they have room to go up markedly.

It is noteworthy that Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan, one of the wisest financial people of our time, has recently mentioned the possibility that the interest rate on the 10-year Treasuries could reach 5% after it temporarily went above the 3% level in April. This would have major implications for the financial markets and could lead to significant losses on long-dated fixed incomed bonds, which we have been avoiding for a long time. A few months ago, such a scenario would have been considered as science-fiction by many. This illustrates well the need to be ahead of the market in anticipating the risks.

Beside the particularly important interest rate risk there remains a range of geopolitical risks. The increasing tensions between the US and the world in trade matters is starting to have implications for companies but the real extent and impact is still unclear and might be less dramatic than the spectacular newspaper headlines regarding “trade wars” would suggest. The election of right-wing parties hostile to the European Union in Italy represents a further risk but the ability of the newly elected to effectively implement dramatic changes in the short term is limited.

A significant development in recent weeks has been the dramatic loss in value of the Turkish lira which has the potential of creating a full-blown economic crisis in Turkey. As European banks have exposure to Turkish banks they could be affected by such a situation although the magnitude of the exposure is relatively limited (and not comparable for example with the major exposure to Italian debt). In addition, Turkey is the fifth-largest trading partner of the European Union and exports could also be affected. In view of this risk we recommend minimizing exposure to the Euro and European equity markets.

American equities did well in July-August; the S&P is now up 6.2% since the beginning of the year. The performance of equity markets in other countries and of most other asset classes continues to be weak. 

No one knows what will happen in the next six months but we believe that in current circumstances one should rather stay on the side of caution.


market performance.jpeg

Staying awake at the helm

2017 ended up as another strong year in the decade long bull market. Almost all major asset classes produced excellent returns particularly the equity markets with the S&P 500 reaching a new all-time high. After so many years of strong performance and low volatility the challenge for many investors might be to stay awake at the helm as the natural tendency might be to expect a continuation of the current trends. It is essential to remember that major changes in market trends and crises often happen when they are least expected. In the financial landscape there is such a thing as a thunder from the blue sky.

We should however emphasize again that we do not have any crystal ball to predict the future and that we do not know what will happen in 2018. A continuation of the current trend is certainly possible and even likely considering the fact that a dramatic worsening of economic and financial conditions does not appear imminent. However the key issue is to manage the risk responsibly in order to be ready also for the less likely but potentially devastating consequences of adverse market developments.

While markets are impacted by macroeconomic factors such as recessions, economic growth and interest rates one of the key parameters is valuation levels. At some point in time assets reach excessive valuations. When this point is reached becomes clear only in retrospect as overvaluation and undervaluation is often in the beholder’s eye and there is no infallible indicator to objectively define them. The best one can do is to try to get a sense of whether assets are closer to being undervalued or overvalued. After ten years of increases in asset prices the answer to that is clear. Currently almost every asset class is trading at all-time highs by any metric (s. graph below).


The question is not whether markets have reached their top or not which no one knows. The right question is about the risks and the opportunities markets currently offer. As we mentioned in our September letter the elevated current valuations mean that equity markets will likely deliver considerably less than the long-term averages of 8-10% in the coming years - a 4-6% annual return for the next five years looks like a realistic possibility. On the risk side it is in or view illusory to try to put a number on the probability of major correction but historically equity markets have regularly experienced bear markers with drops of 30-60% (s. table below). A traditional portfolio with a 70% equity allocation can in such circumstances easily experience a 30% drop which is unacceptable to many investors.


image2 copy.jpg

The current combination of limited upside and increasing downside risk calls for prudence and for overweighing lower risk-assets and those with limited correlation to equity markets. This is not an easy task considering that bonds offer little yield and considerable duration risk. The only solution in our view is to look for less conventional investments that still offer an attractive value proposition. Even dynamic investors willing and able to stomach mark-to-market losses based on the conviction that such losses would be “paper losses” that would be quickly recouped have to be cautious. If they are willing to take the risk of paper losses they should focus on those rare niche opportunities that currently entail high single digits or low double digits return potential –more than for equities and sometimes with less risk.

Finally, an important point to keep in mind is that while history is an important teacher it does not necessarily repeat itself. Assumptions based on past experience can be misleading. A widely held view is that “in the long term stocks always go up”. While this has generally proven true there were exceptions. For the fourteen years period between 1968 and 1982 the real return for the S&P 500 (including dividends) was slightly negative (the real return for bonds was even worse due to inflation). The Nikkei index of Japanese stocks is today still almost 50% down from its peak level three decades ago. This shows the need to avoid relying blindly on historic assumptions as well as the need for diversification across asset classes and geographies.

We thank you for your trust in 2017 and while positioning our portfolios cautiously for any circumstances we do hope that 2018 will be another smooth and profitable financial year.

Click here to download in PDF